Rossi said that the SL reactor produces photons in the 100 to 200 nm range. This is the photon energy that resolves when Hawking's radiation is extracted from the vacuum. Those photons have negative frequency.
As I have repeated a few time: SK energy does not come from transmutation but from Hawking radiation. Rossi has found how to minimize transmutation and produce energy by extracting photons from the vacuum. Photons extracted from the vacuum have negative frequency. This means that they are in the UV or EUV energy frequency range. See: Testing Hawking radiation in laboratory black hole analogues https://phys.org/news/2019-... <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-01-hawking-laboratory-black-hole-analogues.html%3ANKcjkIXomS-41t6Jno1skGW4PaA&cuid=2168707> In their study, Leonhardt and his colleagues made light out of positive and negative frequencies. Their positive-frequency light was infrared, while the *negative-frequency one was ultraviolet*. The researchers detected both of them and then compared them with Hawking's theory. On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:09 PM <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Rossi seems to think the Compton wavelength of the electron is important, > and > Proton21 uses 600 keV electrons. > Perhaps 511 keV is the minimal energy needed by an electron to convert a > proton > into an anti-proton (pair -production??). > > If so then the theoretical maximum energy gain per reaction is a factor of > 2 x (mass of proton) / (mass of electron) = 3672. > > That ought to be enough to cover conversion inefficiencies. ;) > > It also has the great advantage that a star ship wouldn't need to carry > around > massive amounts of dangerous anti-matter, but rather could make what they > need > on-the-fly from ordinary matter. In fact they may even be able to harvest > hydrogen from interstellar space to use as fuel, ensuring that the initial > fuel > load would only need to be sufficient to get them up to a speed where they > can > collect it as fast as they use it. > > Combine this with a reactionless drive, and one has a near light speed > capability to reach the stars. :) > > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
