Hawking radiation is comprised of two entangled photons, One photon is an IR photon and the other is a photon that has a negative frequency partner to the IR photon.
The negative frequency photon when normalize to a positive frequency turns into a UV photon. Time stops at the event horizon. The UV photon is frozen on the event horizon until the black hole is destroyed. In a cosmological black hole, one formed by intense gravity, the cosmological black hole is never destroyed. The cosmological black hole is self perpetuating. But when a EMF black hole forms through pumping of EMF such as through the application of heat, light, or RF, the black hole will be destroyed when the pumping is stopped. When the EMF black hole is destroyed, the energy that it contains is released. The UV photon is free to radiate into our reality. Rossi pumps his EVOs with an alternating RF signal. On every cycle of that signal the EMF black hole accumulates UV photons that are stored on the event horizon. When the signal stops, the EMF black hole dies and the UV photon is released. this pumping cycle happens billions of times each second. Getting deeper into the weeds, the EMF black hole is actually a Bose condensate. When the pumping stops, the condensate falls below the level of coherence that produces an event horizon, and when the pumping stops it goes subcritical and quesent. When the pumping begins again, the condensate gets more powerful to the point where the event horizon reforms. You can see that the SK reactor is a magnificent piece of technology. It is amazing that it was created by trial and error. On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:01 AM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, the process that produces the vacuum effects in the LENR > reaction is a Bose condensate. This condensate is a duel of the > cosmological black hole. What that means is that the Bose condensate > adheres to the same equations that describes a black hole. But there is no > gravity effects involved. Accumulation and concentration of mass is not > required to produce the event horizon. But time dilation seems to be > occuring in the process of transmutation and energy release. > > This Bose condensate is a special type. It may be a Higgs field > condensate. This field gives mass to fermions and this drives quarks into a > state of disorganization. Matter falls apart when exposed to this ultra > dense Higgs field. This generation of extra quark mass is what produces > transmutation. But the nature of the coherent condensate hides the energy > and particles produced by that condensate from our reality. MFMP has > actually taken a picture of this condensate that has come out of LENR fuel > and it appears to be a dark blob with a hexagonal pattern showing on its > inside. This is a sign that it is a supersolid. This is what Rossi calls "a > compact neutral aggregates at a pico-metric (10-12 m) scale", But in > reality, this blob as pictured was 100s of microns in size and visible to > the unaided eye. Rossi must keep his blobs small to keep his reactor from > turning to dust. These blobs can grow very large and powerful. Fabiani has > said that he has seen these blobs that looks like tini stars eating away > the structure of Rossi's reactor. > > Fabiani: "We have photographs of creatures that emit pure light that have > completely melted the reactor down, all in a very quiet way." > > > The LENR reaction is very misleading. Two processes are going on at the > same time: transmutation and energy generation. Transmutation usually does > not result in energy production. > > Radiation mitigation in transmutation is a result of quantum > superposition. > > causal observer: "Multiple pathways could even be interfering with each > other," BINGO. > > Superposition hides the effects of transmutation. All we get out of > transmutation is cold ash. When something is in Quantum superposition, it > is not observable. > > Quantum superposition > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wi... > <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FQuantum_superposition%3ApCz5vJrnAQJvGZfhysv9N1cN90g&cuid=2168707> > > in the Cat state, you cannot see the cat, it is still in the box. if the > cat is dead, over a long time the cat rots away, When you open the box, all > you see is the bones of the cat. > > the Cat state > https://en.wikipedia.org/wi... > <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCat_state%3AeCDoyc8O3aR95qZMLOzPy_qqd9o&cuid=2168707> > > [image: Thumbnail] > <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FhkmoZ8e5Qn0%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg%3A_-YzT8d3d-zEes5Ip-qo6qziVj0&cuid=2168707> > > > There is a density threshold that the Bose condensate must surpass for > quantum superposition to become established. If that threshold is not > surpassed, then all the effects of the nuclear activity of transmutation > will manifest since global quantum superposition is not yet established. > This occurs in a weak reaction. For example, Russ George reports the > production of radiation in his reactors. In addition, radiation appeared > during startup and shutdown on Rossi's early reactors when the Bose > condensate was either building strength or dying away. The density of a > Bose condensate is dictated by the amount of energy pumping that it > receives. Vigorous pumping at reaction initiation will suppress the > production of nuclear radiation products that accompany transmutation. > > All the EUV light that the SK reactor produces comes from the extraction > of energy from the vacuum. The strength of the Bose condensate carried by > the EVOs in the plasma is enough to shield the production of energy, if > any, from transmutation. > > The term vacuum is also misleading, Space time is full of energy. 68% of > the universe is energy (dark energy). Only 4% is matter and light, > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:38 AM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you know the story of Direc and the positron? >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron >> <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPositron%3AVbGDqZeTCzWIjvALMvl045zDPdI&cuid=2168707> >> >> The positron is a negative particle going backward in time, but when time >> is reversed so is the charge and the energy of the positron is turned >> positive (parity-time (PT) state change) (PT symmetry breaking) . >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Hermitian_quantum_mechanics >> <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNon-Hermitian_quantum_mechanics%3A92f4zm3xoCHLI0EcbzY5Ylj3D8A&cuid=2168707> >> >> In a gravity black hole, the gravitational singularity reverses time and >> the positive energy particle becomes a negative energy particle again. >> >> In an analog black hole (a polariton condensate), there is no singularity >> so the infalling particle remains a positive energy particle. This is true >> for photons. Photons with negative frequency are positive energy particles. >> These negative frequency photons are where the 100 to 200 nm EUV photons >> are coming from in the SK reactor each time the analog black hole explodes >> (Bosenova). . Unlike in a gravity based black hole, there is no >> gravitational singularity to reverse time in an analog black hole and the >> positive energy negative frequency photon stays a positive energy particle. >> >> Yes it is complicated, and it is a work in progress. >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:24 AM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEOXYLtbVuvynWTHXLXofKSUqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowzuOICzCZ4ocDMO7xqQY?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen >>> >>> Quantum properties can be separated from particles. If particles are >>> also waves, tt's like separating the music produced by drums from the >>> sounds produced by a band. >>> >>> An electron is comprised of a set of quantum properties just like the >>> music of a band is composed of sounds made by individual instruments. >>> These properties direct the behavior of the electron. Unlike free electrons >>> in a vacuum, these quantum properties can be isolated from other quantum >>> properties when the electron is part of a solid. >>> >>> The coming thing in condensed matter physics and quantum engineering is >>> the ability in general to select these quantum properties of both fermions >>> (electrons) and/or bosons (photons) that are useful and discard the others. >>> >>> It is two of these properties (isospin and hypercharge) called spinors >>> that make up the contents of the Bose condensate. Hypercharge gives quarks >>> and electrons mass. It is what the Higgs field is comprised of. It is >>> possible to isolate this property and apply it to quarks. >>> >>> It is now possible to build a material (LENR Fuel) that hosts electron >>> based quasiparticles that mix and match the quantum properties selected >>> from one or more of its fundamental particle quantum properties that are >>> useful (EVO) and to ignore or restrict the other less advantageous ones. >>> The selected quantum properties can be strengthened and protected while >>> other properties can be ignored. >>> >>> It is possible to isolate hypercharge from electrons and condense this >>> mass giving property into a plasmoid. called an EVO. When the greatly >>> amplified analog Higgs field that has been extracted from electrons are >>> applied to quarks, this field produces transmutation. >>> >>> The Higgs field carries the weak force. It is possible to greatly >>> amplify the Higgs field by extracting hypercharge from the electron and >>> condensing it in a bose condensate. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:56 PM Jonathan Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> BTW, a necessary part of that theory of "part filled containers". the >>>> idea that electrons, protons and such might be able to exist with less that >>>> their regular level of energy and density, and that such energy might be >>>> hard to detect and read... Yet be felt as Bioenergy, Chi, Orgone, Scalar. >>>> etc... >>>> >>>> But if a form of subtle matter and antimatter and it can annihilate, >>>> why doesn't it annihilate with regular matter releasing lots of energy??? >>>> My guess would be that it does/can, but that equal sums of energy are >>>> extracted from both and as such the regular particle loses close to nothing >>>> as it can only lose as much as the lesser party, unless the "soft" particle >>>> has quite a bit of energy in it. >>>> >>>> It could however be that neither can interact or annihilate unless they >>>> are at the same or a very close level of energy. >>>> >>>> If this interpretation of virtual particles not reasonable? >>>> >>>> Couldn't I have found a way of increasing the virtual particle >>>> flux/emission/production? >>>> >>>> BTW, following this line of reasoning I have created my most tangible >>>> energy yet. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:43 PM Jonathan Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Vorts, I have an interesting connection my research has made that >>>>> seems to connect to anti-matter. >>>>> >>>>> As some of you might know (I have been on this list for what, 20 >>>>> years) I began researching the aether, and then 7-8 years ago I made an >>>>> unusual coil that emitted an energy that could be felt, that seemed to be >>>>> "aether" like. >>>>> One observation I made about this technology was the tendency for an >>>>> energy to form in the center of a circle, and then this energy would have >>>>> "beams" come out of it, with one energy going up, and down, one north, one >>>>> south, one east, one west and then also diagonals, making 8 primary beams >>>>> in each direction. But the number isn't important. >>>>> >>>>> This turns out to be not to be a unique discovery, this has been noted >>>>> by others.... >>>>> Then the other day I came to realize that the energy going in the >>>>> opposite direction, happens to "cancel" out the energy! >>>>> So the energy that goes north and the energy that goes south >>>>> annihilate each other! >>>>> >>>>> So, then I started to wonder with more seriousness, "What if my >>>>> 'Aetheric Energy'" is virtual particle pairs? >>>>> I did also find that applying a potential (magnetic, electric, or >>>>> other) would polarize and increase this activity. >>>>> >>>>> So, I began to speculate the following... >>>>> Circles with the right energetic activity create a focal point that >>>>> expresses more virtual particles than the background... >>>>> That the fields helps split the virtual particles apart... >>>>> >>>>> And, now we come to the Crux of this post... >>>>> >>>>> When two virtual particles annihilate, what happens??? >>>>> Answer, nothing! >>>>> >>>>> What happens when two regular particles annihilate??? >>>>> Release of energy, Gamma! >>>>> >>>>> What happens when one half of a virtual particle pair falls into the >>>>> event horizon of a black hole according to accepted science? (Hawking >>>>> radiation) >>>>> It becomes a real particle that if it then annihilates with another >>>>> real particle releases energy... >>>>> >>>>> So, the crux of the question is, "what change occurs to the virtual >>>>> particle to make it real"? >>>>> And I would propose the answer is simply, Time! >>>>> >>>>> Here is what i suspect is going on! >>>>> When a virtual particle is made, it is like an empty container, when >>>>> it annihilates nothing happens. >>>>> However, if energy is "given" to the virtual particle, then it isn't >>>>> any longer empty, but it might not have enough energy to be detected as a >>>>> regular solid particle yet. >>>>> >>>>> However, when it now annihilates, it will release the energy it does >>>>> have. >>>>> >>>>> I think the idea that just because it's other half fell into a black >>>>> hole it instantly becomes "real" is nonsense, what if it's partner >>>>> annihilated with another virtual particle, wouldn't that accomplish much >>>>> the same! Now I just implied that all of space should emit Hawking >>>>> radiation. >>>>> >>>>> When I look at some of the details of Free Energy device claims, >>>>> Antigravity and the like, there is evidence of "half way" electrons >>>>> and mysterious releases of light, could this be partly filled "virtual" >>>>> particles annihilating and releasing light? >>>>> it would make a lot of sense, and it makes sense with regards to >>>>> Quantum Physics too! >>>>> >>>>> If anyone wants to experience the forms that create this tangible >>>>> energy, just ask. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>>
