Robin—
I think you are close to the real model of protons and neutrons. This consideration reflects P. Hatt’s model of nucleons as validated by high energy inelastic electron scattering experiments. The experiments have been evaluated by William Stubbs in several papers and in his recent book on nuclear physical structures. The analyses he has accomplished brings into question the generally accepted model of quarks and a “sea” of gluons. Bob Cook ________________________________ From: mix...@bigpond.com <mix...@bigpond.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 7:37:11 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anti-matter In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200: Hi, [snip] >PS: And please forget the matter anti matter story. It is childish old >physics thinking. Why e.g. can a nucleus expel antimatter ???? >(positron...) Annihilation is only one option when e- e+ meet. Perhaps under the right conditions, an electron can combine with a proton, expelling a positron, and converting the proton into an anti-proton. Then the anti-proton annihilates a normal proton. The expelled positron annihilates an external electron. Charge is conserved because two electrons & two protons have gone. The net result is the complete conversion of mass into energy. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
