It seems that neutrinos are becoming better known with a magnetic moment and carrying angular momentum associated with their intrinsic spin.
See the following https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Also see Stubbs assessment of nucleon physics, including conjecture regarding electron neutrinos associated with “beta” electrons in nucleons. http://vixra.org/pdf/1511.0191v1.pdf which discusses the role of neutrinos on page 22 of the Stubbs paper. Bob Cook -------------------------------- From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 3:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Nick Danger's Top 10 answers for symptom 7 I’m hesitant to suggest a naser beam (neutrinos in a uniform directed beam of a given energy resulting from resonant nucleon transmutations of a group of coherent system nucleons or nuclei.) But, I vote for # 1 on Nick’s list. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 2:52 PM To: Vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]:Nick Danger's Top 10 answers for symptom 7 This is a light-weight piece for the namephreaks out there (we miss you, Herb). In a patho-sci mashup of LENR with Firesign Theatre ("beat the reaper") it's about time to settle on a name for that "mystery radiation" which so charms the alternative energy set. Is it toxic or simply a popular experiment with old men? In the early days of cold fusion (early 1990s) there were dozens of papers on a mysterious emission in the low keV range which happened merely from loading H2 or D2 in either nickel or palladium - often with no other input power. The testing was done using x-ray film, and the positive result is a foggy film once known as an "autoradiograph". In fact, Uranium decay was first discovered by Henri Becquerel using the fogging of film as evidence. His cause of death was unspecified, but he had developed a burn on his chest from a tiny amount of radium carried in his vest pocket. More recently, Holmlid has claimed the mystery radiation appears to be largely muons - but that seems unlikely despite his continuing efforts at identification. We need a better name which may help in getting a better understanding - "nomen est numen" as they say. And don't forget the toxicity issue - Holmlid has suffered from a malady which is probably unrelated, but who knows? A few of these names on the list refer to real phenomena which are partially misunderstood... even if most are clearly influenced by an overactive imagination. LENR has always been a mystery composed of truth mixed with bogosity. We can start the list with an obvious place-marker for the proposition of deriving fact from fiction - but which is still not understood. Funny how they all seem different but then bleed over into each other on closer examination. Who will guess the true identity of symptom 7? 1) Neutrinos 2) Scalar waves, longitudinal waves 3) Magnetic monopoles 4) Tachyons, Hawking radiation 5) ZPE, vacuum energy, aether, EPO field 6) Dark energy or dark matter 7) Orgone, ormus, chi, superlight (magnetic light) 8) Plasmons, polaritons, magnons, spinons, holons, orbitons 9) Cold electricity, radiant energy 10) Negative inertial mass, Casimir force And the winner is ? ... probably the reaper...
