H LV <[email protected]> wrote: At the bottom of the graph it should say "unlikely worst case scenario" > instead of "current path" >
Even the optimistic predictions are catastrophic for the ecosystem, and for many people. , but as Judith Curry points out the media has stopped reading the IPCC > reports and only listens to activists . . . > I read scientists, not activists. The situation is similar to that of cold fusion. You should listen to experts who have studied the problem closely, and who have extensive experience. Not "activists" and not self-appointed experts at Wikipedia. > who have decided on their own that the IPCC reports are too conservative > for their agenda. > > Harry > > On Mon., Dec. 16, 2019, 10:35 p.m. Jed Rothwell, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Global warming is a real problem, and very serious. The notion that >> species will quickly adapt to extreme changes is contrary to everything we >> know about biology. Even now, a slight change in the onset of flowing >> plants threatens to wipe out migratory birds and other animals. >> Furthermore, the speed of changes now occurring is orders of magnitude >> faster than any natural process in the last 20,000 years. See: >> >> https://xkcd.com/1732/ >> >>
