What we can do with SO(4) physics is to give the 4D and 3D/4D wave
structure (SO(4) quantum numbers) for all isotopes what already
explains a lot about the periodic table and of course shows that 207Pb
is the last stable isotope. It also explains very basic things e.g. why
Technetium is instable.
The nuclear interaction/gamma spectrum is guided by the 3D/4D flux of an
isotope. But all wave structures are connected - and do potentially
couple. Only small z isotopes have simple gamma states. For simple
nuclei like 6-Li we can give the exact first gamma state energy based on
the wave energy.
61-Ni has a special magnetic gamma state that is based on a neutron
energy hole wave that perfectly fits - as calculated - the expected
transformation after adding the gamma energy. But this is a rare exception.
For small Z (<= 16) nuclei it is "easy" to find the wave structure but
the impact of added neutrons is not yet completely understood as the
neutron "bonding" is complex, as up to 5 wave couplings are possible.
There is a lot of work to do e.g. to apply the rules to all isotopes and
to progress in the details. I currently do focus on LENR relevant issues
as we just discovered a new? LENR mechanism.
Also particles are of minor interest as it is clear that the neutrino
has no impact on mass calculations. This does not mean that neutrinos
play no role in the mass formation. But they simply do not gravitate and
thus we have no mean to connect them with simple math.
I did some work relevant for the Holmlid stuff to explain some strange
spectra. Kaons,Pions,Muons can be modeled without pain but are not yet
needed for LENR.
There is enough work for dozens of people that are willing to dig in.
But be aware that the next fruits hang much higher and a lot of time is
needed to e.g. expand the simple model to a more broad model, that also
is able to handle simple perturbations
An e-mail exchange is not the right place to explain what is possible
and what has been done already. If a small group of people is ready to
leave the sinking SM Titanic I'm willing to teach them, but this needs
about a week at least.
J.W.
Am 19.12.19 um 19:44 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
Another question for Jurg is whether or not the SO(4) theory provides
a stable physical structure for higher mass isotopes—for example, Ni,
Fe and other nuclear species showing up in LENR experiments?
The thought that generates this question is the idea that a
collection of nucleons making up a heavy isotope may not all be
subject to the same attractive force at the same time. Some may be
loosely held depending upon their respective position in three
dimensional space of a particular isotope with its orientation
dependent upon the direction of its over all magnetic dipole.
As I suggest earlier in this thread, the nuclear weak interaction is
really a magnetic dipole attractive force of all the constituent
elementary particles—electrons, positrons and neutrinos.
This brings up another question for Jurg: What does SO(4) physics say
about neutrinos and their spin and angular momentum?
Bob Cook
Bob Cook
*From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
*Sent: *Thursday, December 19, 2019 7:00 AM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Strange things keep turning up....
It is interesting how many fantasies are developed around SM framework
that so far has no clue what generates the weak force and how to
measure it.
In SO(4) physics the force coefficient (1FC) for the weak force is
exactly defined and allows to calculate the correct electron/electron
spin pairing energy and also one coupling orbit of deuterium and much
more.
The generation of a di-neutron from protons is bare nonsense and
absurd fantasy as this would need an input energy of 782keV/neutron.
The other story we (SO(4) physics) can exactly calculate is the H*-H*
bond that in some nuclear reaction can add like a double neutron. But
the underlying LENR reaction is far more complex than the SM can imagine.
We have perfect spectral measurements of such a reaction which looks
like adding a double neutron.
In a few years LENR will be the dominant field of nuclear physics and
people interested in the standard model have to listen the history
channel.
J.W.
Am 19.12.19 um 04:14 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com
<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>:
From the Abstract of the reference:
“These reactions involve the weak force (Feynman Diagrams are
shown), but they take place in simple electrochemical systems that
are normally thought of in terms of the electromagnetic forces
only. The combined influence of the four isotope effects explains
thousands of, what were considered, anomalous observations by top
electrochemical researchers. The newly described mechanistic
effects involve a very important and almost forgotten intermediate
(the di-neutron) and may even involve unique safety concerns.”
It certainly suggests that the “weak force” is really an EM force
between nucleons—i.e., protons and neutrons or deuterons, as has
been suggested by Hatt, Stubbs and many others… between electrons
and positrons making up nucleons and resulting magnetic dipoles
that cause an attraction between nucleons.
/ITS NOT NEW!!/
//
/1 Bob Cook/
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>for
Windows 10
*From: *Jones Beene <mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
*Sent: *Wednesday, December 18, 2019 8:32 AM
*To: *vortex <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *[Vo]:Strange things keep turning up
This mystery reference appeared in a recent search.
None of the usual players and the impression given is that the
topic is something new... WTF?
Hydrogen and deuterium isotope effects beyond the electromagnetic
force
<https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/hydrogen-deuterium-isotope-effects-beyond-electromagnetic-force/>
mailbox:///Users/juergmain/Documents/Import/Local%20Folders-1/Inbox?number=9895&header=quotebody&part=1.2&filename=812B8E74943048879DCB9F7D6AA156B4.png
Hydrogen and deuterium isotope effects beyond the
electromagnetic force
Cheryl D. Stevenson
(2018) Stevenson, Davis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
A mechanism is presented concerning electroly...
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
