Am 08.02.20 um 17:32 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
Jurg—
Four questions that come to mind are:
* What is the distance in 3-D space between the D*-D* centers needed
to start a common rotation of their respective flux rotations?
In H*-H*/D*-D* the proton perturbative mass joins the flux in a new
common rotation. Normally we should assume that a nuclear mass part
assumes a nuclear orbit given by the charge radius. But all wave
coupling produces a virtual charge and the radius of this virtual charge
must be much larger. I did not yet try to model this new idea as I'm
myself currently in a low energy mode... I once calculated it for H*-H*
using 3D fields only and the result was about 2.4pm or a bit larger than
what Holmlid believes. But we simply do not have enough experimental
support that we would need to exclude some parts of the equation.
The first step of the formation of D*-D* is Rydberg like SO(4) spin
matter. This aligns the proton spin(s) and will result in a 4-He like
structure due to the added orbit force. But one open key question is:
How - if - will the spin waves extend ? Does this lead to a tighter
radius - stronger coupling or just to a steric more stable cluster? How
do the spin orbits interact with the catalyst?
What matching is necessary of angular alignment of the axes of the
respective flux rotation toruses, if any, to allow the common rotation
and transition to a He* with the creation of new free space?
This is to complex to explain in an e-mail. All mass in 4-He is core "4
rotation" mass which can be decomposed from 4x 4 to 2x2 and finally 1x1.
We can discuss this (details) in the workshop as it is part of the early
model already.
And does the new space volume (in 3-D) have any local time associated
with flux rotation frequency or is there no local frequency of magnetic
flux—i.e., no flux in the new space once the photon leaves the new space?
Time is always represented by the frequency that only depends on speed
of light and the total torus path length. Of course this is one key
issues - how the change in topology and number of rotations influences
the path length.
I did notice that some SM assumptions e.g. about live time are wrong
because they use a to short path.
And Is there any specific volume in 3-D associated with the new space?
The space we finally use to calculate energy quantities is the classic
3D space. For this purpose we need to do projections. The only general
thing we can do is to relate energy to lost 3D space what is a first
approximation only. I can show the 4p --> 4-He changes. It would be keen
to define new space measures as in 6D (SO(4)) you can have multiple
forms of "space" e.g. 4D,5D volumes. One thing we know is that in SO(4)
the magnetic flux runs on the higher D (4D, or 5D manifolds) torus
surface and not in the 3D volume otherwise the projection would not
deliver the correct results we see.
Thus if we talk of space-time conversion to photon energy then this
might not 100% match the real 3D space we free, as the numbers of
rotations (2 or 3) are not always the same and even more important: The
real space a nucleus occupies is *given* by the *larges charge radius*
that couples two orbits.
This you can see if you once check nuclear data.
But the universe expands because photons always flow outwards what
generates an outward pressure! It's like a heating pot at ultra large scale.
J.W.
* Is there any specific volume in 3-D associated with the new space?
These questions may be good to consider at the workshop.
Bob
*From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
*Sent: *Friday, February 7, 2020 2:42 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
I think Mills was accurate about self catalyzing of fractional
hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like cheerleaders forming a
pyramid with the lattice as just the ground floor I suspect they can
dilate out from the 3d base structure of the metal lattice and form
blankets of fractional hydrogen in either temporal direction from the
lattice.
The restriction for Mills/hydrino like condensation is given by the
symmetry of the fields and space. Orbits with same mass and topology
can condensate what means start a common rotation what classically
frees space-time what is equivalent to releasing energy.
As said: In the Holmlid case we see such orbit pairing going downhill
from 8 H* --> 2 4-He (8-Be) with a proton finally taking over the
excess energy. This has nothing in common with Mills model as there
always must be a final state with a higher stability/density = number
of flux rotations.
There is just one more rotation possible for one symmetric mass pair
and thus there is only one H*-H* state fora a pair of protons where as
D*-D* can have 4 bonds.
Consequently the next H*-H* condensation only works if you have 2
H*-H* and does not work not for a single pair. This is what Mills missed.
J.W.
Am 07.02.20 um 16:54 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com
<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>:
Fran—
You seem to imply that nature changes depending on your
observation position—at the center of a local hydrogen at 3^rd
base of a lattice nuclet or far away in the batter’s box. Is my
inference correct?
Also you suggest more than one temporal (time) direction. This
suggests 3 or maybe 6 possible time directions relative to 3^rd
base—up, down, back front left or right. Can you explain temporal
direction in more detail? Is there _no_global time that applies
to all points in space, once that point is created?
Bob Cook
*From: *Roarty, Francis X <mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
*Sent: *Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:37 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
Hi Jones, I still suspect Casimir geometry is actually
relativistic and the math they are using is giving the dimensions
from local hydrogen perspective while from our perspective the
hydrogen inside the hydride dilates becoming both faster and
“relatively” smaller, packing out further and further on the
temporal axis while simultaneously getting harder and harder to
detect from the macro world. I think Mills was accurate about self
catalyzing of fractional hydrogen when trapped in a lattice, like
cheerleaders forming a pyramid with the lattice as just the ground
floor I suspect they can dilate out from the 3d base structure of
the metal lattice and form blankets of fractional hydrogen in
either temporal direction from the lattice.
Fran
*From:* Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 04, 2020 9:19 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Superconducting Metal Hydride
I was hoping that this new discovery would show much tighter
hydrogen spacing - in keeping with the various theories for dense
hydrogen.
However, the spacing is far from pico and not extremely compact at
all, and therefore this may result may not be related to LENR.
Fortunately, there is a lot of work going on in superhydrides -
and this work aligns with the long-held suspicion that a transient
form of superconductivity at greater than room temperature - and
the occurrence of LENR are somehow related.
Here is a related paper on another superhydride with a massive 9:1
atomic ratio. Ratios of nine or ten to one are possible with high
pressure.
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-impossible-superconductor.html
It is only a matter of time until a breakthrough occurs in this
field and the extreme pressures now being used, become superfluous.
Terry Blanton wrote:
*/An international team of researchers has discovered the hydrogen
atoms in a metal hydride material are much more tightly spaced
than had been predicted for decades — a feature that could
possibly facilitate superconductivity at or near room temperature
and pressure./*
https://scitechdaily.com/room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-at-oak-ridge-national-laboratory/
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06