..rather than trying to re-summarise the whole thing here, anyone
interested should review my current thread on the BWF;  currently looking
at 471 Joules in, for 854 Joules out, with an uncertainty of +/- 0.4
Joules, from this interaction:

https://i.ibb.co/BPVMtbV/Fully-Active-low-res.gif
(that's just a low-quality animation of the measured examples)


It's basically sinking counter-momenta to gravity and accumulating the
resulting momentum rise at constant energy cost (evolving linearly WRT
velocity) for a squaring KE value.

The energy gain is substantially greater than the GPE cost of rendering the
effective N3 break.

Current efficiency appears to be 181%, across the board - ie. you can put
in as much as you want by raising the 'target relative speed'..


As ever, caveat emptor - just cos i ain't found the FUBAR yet don't mean it
ain't there..

The thread's a meandering night-by-night research log, hypotheses all over
the place, and so might be more informatively read backwards as forwards
(you know how these things go):

https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=172273#172273

Don't wanna waste anyone's time on the one hand, but wanna keep you guys in
the loop if it's real..  i honestly don't know what more i could do with it
if it is..

(i know it's a chore but would appreciate if the thread were checked first
to see if specific questions are already answered, tho happy to oblige
either way)

Reply via email to