Jed— To answer your question to me: “Are you trying to pick a fight about an undergraduate paper in Sapporo?” The answer is NO. Its your translation of the paper that I question. I only am asking about YOUR OWN translation/interpretation of the subject verification of Mizuno work. I do not read Japanese.
I found your translation confusing, given the text that immediately followed the Figure 1 diagram. Your use of the phrase “this new hydrogen energy from fusion” in this text translation was the confusing part of the translation. I read about 95 % of Vortex-l threads, and its not a matter of like or dislike. The determination of my attention to any particular thread is based on the credibility of the source of the information being presented. Bob Cook ---------------------------------- From: Jed Rothwell<mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 7:22 AM To: Vortex<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> <bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: “Figure 1. Principle of nuclear fusion. (Deuterium and tritium are shown undergoing fusion to produce energy, neutrons and helium.)” “In the present study, by using this new hydrogen energy from fusion, we hope to confirm a new power generation method that may replace conventional power generation methods, such as thermal power, hydropower, nuclear power, wind power, and solar power generation. The purpose is to obtain an input/output ratio of energy two times or more higher than input.” Was the report merely obfuscation and fake news from your perspective, in that, as you point out, Mizuno does not use tritium? I do not understand what you are talking about. Of course he does not use tritium. There is no mention of using tritium in this paper, or any of his other papers, or any papers in the cold fusion literature as far I recall. Many experiments produce tritium, but I have never heard of anyone starting with it. Figure 1 shows conventional plasma fusion, as I am sure you realize. I don't understand what you are saying, and I don't understand why you are saying it. Are you trying to pick a fight about an undergraduate paper in Sapporo? It seems pretty good to me. If you don't like it, don't read it. - Jed
