>>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their respective 
 >>domains<<
When "they" talk of those "domains" - there is a lot of handwaving; general 
relativity is often said to breakdown at the singularity, and quantum mechanics 
supposedly fails to be able to deal with gravity; but no maths for that is 
presented as to precisely when equations from such theories fail. 

    On Monday, 8 June 2020, 20:03:09 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> 
wrote:

 >>Thoughts?<<
there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) with 
quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them then 
they are not on solid ground.


I only mentioned SR because it is often wrongly invoked to dismiss any 
experiment needing simultaneity. On the issue reconciling the two domains of 
quantum mechanics and SR/GR, instead of trying to change one or the other or 
both, it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their 
respective domains and build a bridge between the domains by integrating them 
technologically instead trying to merge them into a single mathematical theory.
Harry

 
>From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood so 
>false claims are made about it. My latest video-I think it was mainly written 
>by his wife.




    On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 17:25:51 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: 
 
 
 Quantum Non-locality explained by Sabine 
Hossenfelderhttps://youtu.be/XL9wWeEmQvo

I disagree with the conclusion that non-locality cannot be used to send an FLT 
message. What is overlooked is that an indeterminate state, i.e. unmeasured 
state is also a type of information. 
If the transmitter and the receiver have synchronised clocks (which is possible 
in SR) then the transmitter can send a message by a sequence of binary choices: 
either measure or not measure the particle's spin in the diagonal direction at 
a given time. What the receiver detects will be meaningfully informed by the 
sequence of the transmitter's choices. 

Thoughts?
Harry
  
  

Reply via email to