Ok, to clarify *this* emission theory is wrong in other domains. Perhaps a new emission theory will be formulated that will work in those other domains.
harry On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: > Good animation. > > > emission theory DOES NOT makes wrong prediction in other domains. > > > What probably really talking about is misapplying emission theory in > other domains > > > > the claim "emission theory makes wrong predictions in other domains" is > just a meme promoting a falsehood > > > It is an example of lie which - if a lie is repeated often enough then > people start believing it. > > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "H LV" <hveeder...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Sunday, 6 Dec, 20 At 18:23 > Subject: [Vo]:animation of emission theory > > I made a little gif animation of the Michelson Morely experiment using the > emission theory of light which says the velocity of the source can be added > to the speed of light. > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lC0zjWc1V6XtSa8_Tuwbtu-Gq62T1ukG/view?usp=sharing > > Using the theory of an aether wind in 1887, Michelson and Morely predicted > the waves would arrive back at the corner of the 'L' at different times > which would result in a fringe shift, but no fringe shift was detected. The > emission theory successfully explains this "null result" because the waves > arrive at the corner at the same time. However, the emission theory is now > widely rejected because it makes wrong predictions in other domains. > > Harry > >
