Charge is a topological effect of magnetic flux. Since more than 100
years people believe that the magnetic moments of particles/atoms are
created by a ring current. In reality it's the other way round. Flux
always travels at light speed. So the charge is stationary. But physics
is symmetric (just assume the flux stays!) and the classic assumption
delivers the same result.
Magnetic lines do rotate according basic Maxwell laws. So in classic 3D
space you can have 2 independent rotations. (Also classically known the
two spherical harmonics in QM solutions). Generally you can have n-1
independent rotations in n dimensional space.
From this picture it is trivial to see that for Euklidian space the
rotations never cover the full space in a symmetric way. The cover only
works for spherical shells that in reality are 2D isomorphous. So in
average always on dimension is carrying less flux than the others. Just
draw 2 circles on two neighbor sides of a cube, then you will see that
one edge has double the flux than the other two. As the flux
asymmetrically rotates in all dimensions there is always one preferred
dimension (in the local frame of the particle) with a net flux that
induces charge. If we say this frame rotates, then there is always in
average a net charge generating flux!
(This is 80% of the explanation. The flux tube needed for Farradays law
is to complex to explain it here.)
J.W.
On 26.01.2021 21:54, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote:
A charge be the same as a changing B field intensity in a space
volume quanta. The definition of resonance that Jurg uses is a key
concept, I think an absolute time dimension does not exist, but is
apparent from magnetic flux circulation in a locale,
A better question is how are space and magnetic flux related IMHO.
Is magnetic flux a dimension akin to space? And is it
quantized? Spin—a rotating B flux is a potential resulting phonmenon.
Bob Cook
-----------------------
*From: *Robin <mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
*Sent: *Tuesday, January 26, 2021 12:02 PM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:The Higgs polariton
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:14:50 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
> From the SO(4) model it is clear that the electron is a resonance of
>the proton. In the bound (ground) state there is no electron as we know
>it from the unbound state.
>
>The electron unfolds in three steps as it is a three wave structure that
>breaks up.
This then leads to the question...what is charge?
[snip]
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
