Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The fact that it is more infectious may turn out to be a boon rather than
>> a problem, as it would
>> outpace all other strains, and "immunize" those who are unwilling to get
>> the jab.
>> It may also save governments around the world from having to spend
>> billions on vaccines.
>>
>
That would not save any money. On the contrary, it would cost hundreds of
times more than vaccinations. A vaccinated person seldom gets sick. An
unvaccinated person who suffers from a mild case of COVID or influenza will
have to spend a week or two recuperating. That means missing days of work,
and taking over the counter medication. The cost of the missed work and
medication far exceeds the cost of two or three vaccines. Also, some number
of people will die from Omicron no matter how mild it is. Even if it is as
mild as influenza, it will kill hundreds of thousands, and many others will
suffer long term damage, whereas not a single person has died or been
seriously hurt by the mRNA vaccines, even after 6 billion doses. So, the
vaccine is far safer.

Influenza is less deadly than Omicron, yet influenza vaccines are far
cheaper and safer than getting influenza. That is why governments
everywhere subsidize them and give them out for free.

A vaccine is always cheaper and safer than the disease it prevents. That is
why children are given vaccines for chickenpox and mumps, which are seldom
deadly diseases. (Children in the US have to get these vaccines to attend
school.)

Reply via email to