In that paper Schwinger refers to one of his earlier papers.
I believe this paper he presented at the first CF conference is based on it:

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchwingerJnuclearene.pdf

In it he puts forward a rough mathematical argument (which I don't pretend
to understand) as to
why he thinks H-D fusion is more likely in a lattice.

These two paragraphs grabbed me in particular:

<<In the early days of radar, prior to, and at the start of the Second
World War, although the British had begun with radio waves that were called
high frequency, HF, the need for better resolution led them to VHF, very
high frequency, which inexorably brought about VHFI, very high frequency
indeed. I mention this ancient history because, in our study of cold
fusion, CF, it is useful, and implies no serious loss of relevance, to
consider VCFI, very cold fusion indeed. That is, we examine the lattice
state at absolute zero. Then there are no phonon excitations — it is the
phonon vacuum state — at least initially.>>

 <<But what is particularly striking is that a change in a parameter by 25%
alters the production rate by a factor of ten million, a degree of
sensitivity that verges on chaos. In as much as the single parameter Ro/Λ
combines, albeit crudely, the effects of all the forces at work within the
lattice, the difficulties encountered in reproducing the cold fusion
phenomena become more understandable.>>

Harry




On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:51 AM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The other day Francesco Celani and his friend asked me if I know of any
> papers that discuss the role of H in the bulk Pd cold fusion. Can H enhance
> the reaction? Is there an H-D reaction? I said I don't recall any papers
> like that. It turns out they already found one, which I added to the
> library:
>
> Schwinger, J., *Cold fusion: a hypothesis*. Z. Naturforsch. A, 1990. *45A*:
> p. 756.
>
> https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchwingerJcoldfusion.pdf
>
> QUOTE:
>
> The hypothesis that I now advance has the following ingredients:
>
>
> (1) The claim of Pons and Fleischmann to have realized cold fusion is
> valid.
>
> (2) But, this cold fusion process is not powered by a DD reaction. Rather,
> it is an HD reaction which feeds on the small contamination of D2O by H2O.
>
>
>
> Ed Storms has often said there may be an H-D reaction, but I do not think
> he says this is optimum, or that it enhances the reaction.
>
> Here is what I wrote back to Francesco:
>
> Ed Storms and others have speculated that a mixture of hydrogen and
> deuterium might produce different products. You can read Ed's papers for
> details. I do not recall anyone testing this hypothesis. I do not recall
> reading a paper that suggested a combination would produce better results.
> Many people have said that allowing hydrogen contamination of deuterium
> prevents the reaction with the bulk-Pd - D system. Bockris and others said
> it was important to prevent exposing heavy water to air, because heavy
> water is hydrophilic. Bockris used to keep heavy water in a medical IV bag
> (with no air), and he added it to the cell with an IV tube, which is small.
> You put the valve at the end of the tube, and open it to add make-up heavy
> water to the cell.
>
> Bockris also said that CO2 contamination of heavy water poisons the
> reaction.
>
>

Reply via email to