Did you check out https://www.academia.edu/s/18395c2bc3?source=ai_email ?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:04 PM Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't put any on tick tok. > > I didn't 'put' any anywhere. > > Again, every day for the last few weeks i've come home from work and > checked YouTube for the last 24 hrs' UAP uploads. > > I skip the dross, and categorise the rest. So, 'this one goes under this > header, this one belongs on that list, this is the same type from that vid > last week', etc. etc. > > This very basic methodology - a simple case of 'having to start somewhere' > with such an enormous data set available - has revealed that most > sightings, currently, if not historically, are of these mysterious box-orbs. > > This is a new type of UFO, to me, anyway. In fact, i don't see ANYONE > else describing it as a widespread phenomenon - as i say, most only seem to > get reported, and commented upon, as if they were unique examples - no one > else has made the link that they're actually ubiquitous! > > This thus qualifies as a new scientific discovery, one that directly > speaks to the deepest, most profound questions of natural philosophy (not > least conservation of momentum and energy). > > So i'm here presenting that list - primarily drawing attention to the > prevalence of these hitherto unheard-of 'box-orb' captures. > > What's so stunning is that most of the boxes / cubes are caught in broad > daylight, or at least, twilight. > > This enables us to clearly identify that they're the same type of craft - > obviously harder to do when all you can see is a glowing orb at night. > > If you click on the link to the list in the first post, it'll pop up a > test file full of URL's - all you need do is copy-paste them into a > browser. What you'll see is DOZENS of independent video captures of flying > fish-tanks in broad daylight. > > Mostly, they're cubes by day, and glowing orbs by night. However this > rule is not absolute - some vids show cubes by night, and orbs by day. > Most orbs are orange or white, yet many other colours are seen; some are > seen changing colour. Some behaviours seem colour-typed. > > So the Tik Tok link you actually clicked on - the one, single link i > hadn't truncated (how lazy are we?) - i only referenced because it's a > second example of two box-orbs linked by a tether. If you complete the YT > link of the other example, you'll see the same thing, different time and > place. > > I'm well aware all of the comments on Tik Tok identify it as fire lanterns > - social media is for numbskulls, i've never had any social media accounts > and never will, it's a horde of mindless ignoramuses and no one else has > seen this list of related examples; like me when i saw what i thought were > fire lanterns, it seems the most likely explanation if you don't know any > better - Chinese lanterns are a thing, and UFO's are woo - precisely your > logic too, perfectly rational response - but the whole point of this list > is to PROVIDE that context necessary for proper analysis, ie. comparison > with other phenomenon. > > Show me a type of fire lantern that looks anything like these things.. i > mean, it's a glassy, iridescent, semi-opaque box or rectangle - a > hexahedron, bashically - sometimes appearing dark-metallic or titanium-like > - often seen rotating or tumbling on all three axes, that momentarily > disappears then reappears as it flies. When seen in groups, this optical > 'phasing in/out' sometimes synchronises between objects. > > After adding dozens of examples to the list, last week YT threw up the > first one showing a tethered pair. I'll repeat the full link here so you > can just click on it (sorry if this is video-bombing the page for anyone > else): > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZubVcEHtBlw > > Note how, like the others, they phase in and out in sync - again, use > comma and period keys (< and >) for frame advance/back while paused. These > are categorically the same type of craft seen in many of the other links. > The only difference is that clearly-visible tether. > > People see tethered flying boxes and think "fire lanterns!" by default - > as i say, i would've too, if i didn't know any better. Getting folks > informed, in order to be able to analyse these things in their proper > context, is my whole raison d'etre, here.. > > But that was just one, perhaps freak, example of the tethering behaviour - > maybe one had broken down and was under tow or something. So you can > appreciate my excitement when i found another, again on YT, this time in a > compilation video. That video referenced its sources, and the segment > showing this second tethered pair happened to come from Tik Tok, so, since > it didn't require a sign-up to view, i linked the source rather than the > timestamped YT video segment.. > > So, while everyone else is stuck on "what is it?" and "it's fire > lanterns!", i'm the only person (apparently) aware of this broader context, > and other related examples. I'm perhaps the only person who realises that > it's most definitely, categorically NOT fire-lanterns. That's way too much > responsibility, hence why i'm here, trying to SHOW (not just 'tell') other > smart people. That's why i'm reporting it here, and not on > social-bleedin'-media. > > Since making that initial post here however, the suspicion that the orbs > and boxes were the same thing is now demonstrated beyond doubt, so we're > making pretty good progress, from initially identifying a > previously-unknown alien tech-base only weeks ago, to realising certain > common behaviours and characteristics, haunts and habits of these things.. > and if you'll just LOOK at what i'm showing you, you'll make no protest at > the conclusion of 'aliens' - it's the single-most consistent (nay, OBVIOUS) > explanation, there, i said it. > > The latest revelation seems to be that at least some of these things are > deposited and then later collected by, umm, flying saucers. Just check out > the videos showing it. Faked? One or two, maybe.. but also check out the > 'spin-launcher' section - one's filmed in Japan, the other a witness > account from Egypt - these things also eject orbs, and other videos show > them being released by red orbs and perhaps others too - again, lots of > witness testimonies describe orbs releasing more orbs (ie. Rendlesham > forest incident for example), so either saucers are appearing as orbs (much > as cubes do perhaps) or else saucers are PART of this tech-base, but not > necessarily the only thing deploying or collecting box-orbs. > > Give it another week and that picture may be a bit clearer too. > > I'm happy to do all the legwork linking these links, but i AM asking that > you review the actual evidence before concluding on it, which specifically > regards the weight of CORROBORATION between independently-sourced data; > IOW, you need to look at ALL (or at least a good few) of the exhibits, not > just one or two in isolation, before you can determine whether they really > do all belong under the headings i've grouped them under. The point is not > whether any one or two could be faked, suspect or otherwise > mis-categorised, but rather that the overwhelming consistency between them > PROVES that 'the category' itself is valid, that it exists, that it's 'a > thing' with certain identifiable properties, behaviours and > characteristics.. moreover, that it's an INTELLIGENT agent, demonstrating > a far more advanced technology than ours. And no one else is talking about > it, in such specific terms, anyway; 'box-orbs' (or whatever name best > sticks) should be as instantly-recognisable a UFO as flying saucers - > moreso, just going by the numbers - yet till now they've been relatively > incognito.. the most common type of UFO that no one's ever heard of. > > Ten minutes of copy-pasting links into a desktop browser will enable you > to evaluate weeks of my research here; the payoff to yourselves for that > small investment is knowledge, of a profound nature... and if i need sell > it any harder, it's probably not for you in the first place.. > > If i was posting slides of LENR data, everyone would click without > hesitation.. but this is far bigger a revelation - these things are > obviously exploiting over-unity physics, their designers have obviously > forgotten more about CMP than our kind will ever learn.. are their > capabilities non-Newtonian, or super-Newtonian? Limited to light-speed, or > superluminal / interdimensional? In principle (Copernicus's), anything > they can do, we could do too.. But more than this, who and what are they, > why are they here and what are they doing? Are there intentions benign, or > exploitative? Entirely hands-off passive observers, or surreptitious > manipulators / 'engineers'? Are these recon missions we're seeing, or > communication attempts, or what? They're ostensibly collecting a great > deal of information about us and our world.. but there's no intergalactic > 'data protection act' we're aware of; what are they doing with our data? > Might they sell it on to other entities? Just because they're not > ostentatiously attacking us like sci-fi baddies, doesn't mean we're out of > the woods - might we be in some kind of slow-boil scenario, our time-scales > insignificant to theirs? Do they have power of agency over us - are they > in any way controlling or manipulating our destiny, and then, for our > benefit or theirs / some other? > > But if anyone thinks for one moment i'm raising these questions over > bloody fire-lantern sightings, you REALLY need to actually look at the > data, get yourself over that first incredulity barrier.. > > All i'm doing is joining dots - watching vids, and categorising them - but > there's stunning new science here, breathtaking vistas on undiscovered > country.. what more in life could any of us want? > > Pour yourself a stiff drink, get on your desktop or a big laptop (anything > but a phone!), open the list from the first post in this thread, and start > comparing what you're seeing in each vid. I guarantee you your paradigm > will shift.. a before / after thing. > > Certainty, of knowledge you thought forever out of reach, is minutes away, > at your leisure.. trust me, before finishing that list you'll know we're > not alone in the universe, much less, here on Earth.. > > ! >
