Eric Lerner argues the "unexpected" data from the JWST is expected in an non-expanding universe. Of course if the universe is not expanding he also says explaining the hubble redshift relation would require some new physics.
Harry On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:32 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > As Lerner admits, the CMB is the main thing which is holding the big bang > theory together. > > Yet the 'experts' really can't explain exactly how CMB radiation, which is > moving away from us at light-speed from a single point in time, manages to > somehow magically be reflected back so as to be observed by us as a rather > strong signal. > > Maybe CMB should not be observable in 3 space at all. > > IOW - it can be argued that the cosmic background is itself poorly > understood and not the best feature with which to base important derivative > theories on (like the big bang)... > > > H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Eric Lerner comments on the first data from the JWST: > > The Big Bang didn't happen > What do the James Webb images really show? > https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-didnt-happen-auid-2215 > > > Eric Lerner's claims are deflated in this article: > > https://www.cnet.com/science/space/no-james-webb-space-telescope-images-do-not-debunk-the-big-bang/ > > Harry > >
