One curious detail which sounds crazy but is worth a passing mention is the 
physical similarity of the experiment to the design of Stanley Meyer's device. 
Has this ever been mentioned before?

This experiment uses two closely spaced brass tubes, one of which is plated 
with iron. The results are said to be due to anomalous ionization. Galvanic 
corrosion is not emphasized as the operative effect. The surface effect of 
confined gases could also be a factor also not emphasized. There is little 
proof of anything nuclear.

Consider the Tesla turbine disk, with its spacing of 0.5 mm which reportedly 
provides the highest efficiency in another device where surface effects are 
seen. That is, there is an optimal disc spacing distance in the turbine device 
which could be related to this whole picture of a non-chemical energy anomaly. 

Of course, this spacing is much larger than the Casimir geometry but that 
effect could somehow be involved in a derivative way, With Meyer's device, if  
- IF -  there is also anomalous ionization due to geometry alone - that is - of 
closely spaced electrodes, and ... if this net electrical charge somehow makes 
it to the combustion chamber to aid in the hydrogen burning then the answer 
could be in some dependence on the actual spacing within the physical structure 
itself. 

Who knows? Maybe Grimer's beta atmosphere is involved ...

Jones

    Jed Rothwell wrote:  
 See:  Di Stefano, A. Experimental Observation on the Lattice Energy Converter, 
preprint and PowerPoint slides. in ICCF24 Solid-state Energy Summit. 2022. 
Mountain View, CA.

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DiStefanoAexperiment.pdf


  

Reply via email to