I've seen the demo of an interesting tool, ResearchGPT, to have a discussion with a scientific paper.
" <https://www.reddit.com/r/GPT3/?f=flair_name%3A%22Tool%3A%20FREE%22> Introducing researchGPT – An open-source research assistant that allows you to have a conversation with a research paper or any pdf. Repo linked the comments. <https://www.reddit.com/r/GPT3/comments/112ncf0/introducing_researchgpt_an_opensource_research/> " Maybe some researchers could have access to the beta version. https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/117mre5/introducing_researchgpt_an_opensource_research/ Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 16:20, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Akito Takahashi commented on the laser fusion experiment that was in the > news some months ago. I translated his comments. Then I had ChatGPT and > translate.google.com translate them. ChatGPT is almost as good as a > human. It almost could have fooled me, except for one or two words. > translate.google.com made several mistakes. You can see it is a computer > translation. I think it got the basic meaning correct. > > ChatGPT made a strange error. It left out a parenthetical comment. I told > it about that, and it generated a new version. It also said "neutral > neutron" which a human would not say. > > Here is the ChatGPT translation. The part it left out in the first version > is underlined: > > This is a laser implosion D-T fusion reaction with a COP of 1.2. As an > experiment, it is groundbreaking because it exceeded the energy break even > (COP=1). However, in order to implement it in society, it requires a > technology that can repeatedly shoot multiple high-intensity beams (36?) of > laser pulses with a COP>5 and synchronize the injection of DT solid > pellets. Without this, it cannot be a power plant. The 14MeV neutral > neutron from the DT reaction *(my old specialty)*, as well as technology > to convert it into heat energy using a Li blanket, radiation damage and > countermeasures due to neutral materials, and the proliferation of T > (tritium), which does not occur naturally, are required. It will take > decades to become a commercial reactor." > > (In short, the current situation is that there is exaggerated advertising > for the budget acquisition of a large number of troops behind it.) > > Here is my correction to ChatGPT after the first version. This shows you > can have a bilingual conversation: > > You left out this part: （私の昔の専門）, which modifies 14MeV中性子 > > > Here is the translate.google.com version: > > One shot laser implosion D-T pulse fusion reaction at COP=1.2. As an > experiment, it is epoch-making because it exceeded the energy break even > (COP=1). For social implementation, high-intensity multiple-beam (36 ?) > laser-pulses can be fired repeatedly at 10 shots per second with COP>5, and > without the technology to synchronously inject DT solid pellets at the > target, power generation reactors not. Technological development is > required for the conversion of 14 MeV neutrons (my old specialty) in the DT > reaction into thermal energy with a Li blanket, countermeasures against > activation and damage of materials by neutrons, and growth of unnatural T > (tritium). It will be several decades before it becomes a commercial > furnace. > > (In short, the current situation is behind the hype to obtain a budget for > the lives of a large number of troops.) > > My version: > > This is a laser implosion D-T fusion reaction with a COP of 1.2. As an > experiment, it is groundbreaking, because it produced energy exceeding > break even (COP=1). However, in order to implement this in a practical, > commercial generator, we will need technology that can repeatedly shoot > multiple high-intensity laser pulse beams (perhaps 36?) with a COP>5, > synchronized with the injection of DT solid pellets. Without such > technology, this cannot be used in a power plant. Dealing with 14 MeV > neutron radiation from the DT reaction (my old specialty), will require > extensive new technology, first to convert the reaction into heat energy > using a Li blanket, and to deal with damage from neutron activation of the > blanket material, and the proliferation of T (tritium), a radioactive > material not found in nature. It will take decades to develop such > technology to make this into a commercial reactor. > > (In short, the current situation is that this is exaggerated public > relations puffery to obtain the budget from Congress, which must support > the large number of researchers needed for this project.) > >
