The point is that as you shrink it energy density will increase and I simply assume there is a limit for how much density space can take. I alsa suggest that this limit is consistent with lorentz transformations as it would not make sense if this depends on which frame the observer has. This also meen a finite size of the structure and hence not a point and not spherical. That's why you need to overlay multiple copies of it and symmetrize. You could see these arguments as a foundation for Mills GUTCP. Here is my blog where you can read more about the idea http://itampe.com/a-comment-on-special-relativity.html
On Sat, 6 May 2023, 02:10 Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> wrote: > In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27 > +0200: > Hi Stefan, > > Though I find it difficult to visualize, I think that if you allow the > major radius of a toroid to shrink to zero, you > end up with a sphere. > Cloud storage:- > > Unsafe, Slow, Expensive > > ...pick any three. > >
