I added a new name for this paper a new link I have different names on this one,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GChNtVtTgvQzF4jSu1tSjCx5ub9lu4RD/view?usp=share_link On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 9:05 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > Also the potential is not correct... > > If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3 -1/3 you will get 2*(2/9) - 4/9 = 0! > because 2/3 are repulsive... > > You should always write down all details of what you exactly name how and > what e.g. potential means. > > The Dirac equation is plain nonsense as the e/p magnetic moment field (the > strongest of all) is missing. Also the 3 rotation solution is unphysical > for mass... > > So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage... > > J.W. > On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build > it up as an addition of such paths. > > On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > >> Stefan >> >> There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a >> sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v) >> >> >> J.W. >> >> On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: >> > I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the >> > connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects >> > experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model and >> > end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities. >> > >> > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0Rcp4A5BBrGDRkR5tC/view?usp=drivesdk >> > >> > I will blog in easier to understand format later. But really it's not >> > a difficult stude, which is a good thing in my mind. >> >> -- >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> Bifangstr. 22 >> 8910 Affoltern am Albis >> >> +41 44 760 14 18 >> +41 79 246 36 06 >> >> -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
