How is the Casimir effect consistent?

On Mon, May 22, 2023, 12:50 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> The 2 laws of thermodynamics are largely taught in coilleges and
> universities around the world.
>
>
>
>
>
> They are:
>
>
>
>    1. Conservation of energy in all interactions of matter within the
>    boundaries of a  adiabatic system;
>    2. Entropy (a measure of disorder,  energy density special
>    homogeneity)  in an adiabatic closed system of matter
>
>
>
>
>
> The total energy of a closed system consists of potential energy
> associated with fields and kinetic in local clumps of matter.  Furthermore
> it is broadly considered that the potential energy equals the kinetic
> energy of the system and , if the system is adiabatic and stable, the
> kinetic must be rotational (spin) with quantized angular momentum.
>
> There is  no free energy  with corresponding LINEAR MOMENTUM in a stable
> system.
>
>
>
> The theory of quantum mechanics post dates the theory thermodynamics , but
> is considered  consistent IMHO.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch>
> *Sent: *Friday, May 19, 2023 2:48 PM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Fundamentals of charge
>
>
>
> Stefan,
>
> All old models are ideals and simplifications. Nature is highly non
> linear and you certainly cannot increase the angular momentum by n*h.
> The reason is that after adding a quantum of energy the next resonance
> is slightly larger. So it looks like h(1+1)*(1+dh)^n...
>
> In mechanics you can get n for macroscopic bodies only under very
> special conditions...
>
> J.W.
>
> On 19.05.2023 21:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> > http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html
> >
> > I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to
> > pan out very nicely when I start to investigate math more seriously.
> > It all fit very well, actually a very satisfying result and this will
> > make the foundations of Mills GUTCP very understandable. I can't help
> > but think that this is a 1900 approach to superstrings ...
>
> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr. 22
> 8910 Affoltern am Albis
>
> +41 44 760 14 18
> +41 79 246 36 06
>
>
>

Reply via email to