In reply to MSF's message of Fri, 02 Jun 2023 18:01:13 +0000: Hi, Several years ago, I suggested to Mills in private email that a surface containing pits that had a dimension matching the wavelength of a photon with the same energy as his "energy hole", might function as a catalyst for Hydrino production, but he appears to have ignored my suggestion. Your report of a water droplet on nano-porous Aluminium might be confirmation, though I suspect a more likely explanation is that the water simply reacted chemically with the Aluminium because the oxide layer that normally covers it was disrupted.
[snip] >I can't help but suspect that they are the same thing. Since the LEC seems to >work with the the phenomenon of nanoporosity and doesn't necessarily need >catalyst metals such as palladium, perhaps all of CF, LENR, CANR work on this >principle and are not fusion at all, but some other phenomenon not yet well >understood. Maybe it works like the atomic hydrogen torch, where splitting >diatomic hydrogen and then recombining it results in large energy release. Or >maybe the nanoporosity literally splits the diatomic hydrogen and then crushes >it into the hydrino. Water molecules could be similarly broken down within the >nanopores. [snip] Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof.
