The interesting point is that despite lack of market value for the tech, it seems to actually violate long standing physical laws plus there seems to be an intrinsic window where the actual gain is around 50 percent over input
The heat pump, in contrast, merely taps environmental heat and there is no physical anomaly This situation is somewhat like the Griggs pump scenario of many decades ago... ... in that there apparently is a real anomaly but only a small market for low grade heat To my knowledge, the cavitation tech and real gain of Griggs has never been debunked Jed Rothwell wrote: Nicholas Palmer <greendirectionconsult...@googlemail.com> wrote: If it can only manage a COP of 1.5-2.5, it's not as effective as a heat pump... Yes. 1.5 has no practical use. Still, 50 W excess is good because it can be measured with confidence. I think they said the results are "consistent." If they can make it happen every time, "consistently" with about the same magnitude, then I would say it is important progress. One of the articles says it is not ready for practical applications yet. I suppose they realize that 100 W in, 150 W out has no useful applications.
