H L V <[email protected]> wrote: P&F's later acknowledged that their neutron measurements were done > incorrectly. However I wasn't aware, or perhaps I had forgotten, that > they had also measured gamma rays. In part 2 the gamma ray peak is > explained as an instrument artifact. (Relevant part begins at about 40 > minutes) Did P&F accept this criticism at a later date because it > appears from the video that they did not acknowledge this possibility. >
Fleischmann acknowledged this at MIT and elsewhere, many times. I do not recall if he published a paper retracting it. Frankly, I don't see what difference it makes. As Stan Pons said, in our line of work if your batting average is 200, you are doing well.
