-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene

T&M do mention Podkletnov in their paper. They admit that their effect is smaller than previously claimed by him, but the main distinction (generally ignored by many pundits) is that Podkletnov used an "unaccelerated" (constant velocity) superconducting disk, whereas the effect produced by T&M occurs *only* during acceleration. 

<><><><><><>

That's not the way I remember it.  Podkletnov did both:

"A high-temperature $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-x}$ bulk ceramic superconductor with composite structure has revealed weak shielding properties against gravitational force in the state of levitation at temperatures below 70 $K$. A toroidal disk was prepared using conventional ceramic technology in combination with melt-texture growth. Two solenoids were placed around the disk in order to initiate the current inside it and also to provide rotation about its central axis. Samples placed over the rotating disk demonstrated a weight loss of 0.3-0.5\%. When the rotation speed was slowly reduced by changing the current in the solenoids, the shielding effect became considerably higher and reached 1.9-2.1\% at maximum."

http://amasci.com/freenrg/pod1.txt
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com

Reply via email to