Jones wrote: > > Fred wrote. > > > They '"decelerate it" by increasing the magnetic field of the > > solenoids don't they, Jones? Any device in rotation at a > > constant angular speed has a dv/dt = v^2/r acceleration because > > of the constant change of direction of the tangential velocity > > vector. > > > Curiously - WRT to the recent ESA group experiment, this might > imply that only gravity-enhancement (as opposed to anti-gravity) > is usable with superconducting technology - which acts somewhat > like a "sail" against the flux at the interface. However the > "return interface" may exist in yet another and more-deeply > enfolded fractal (in the original sense of "factional dimension")
I think proton "quarks" will always attract regardless of spin direction, but electrons manipulated-accelerated in the right manner can repel gravity if you can come up storing 10 KW/tonne. OTOH. using that magnetized stamping machine spinning as a gyro to stabilize the antigravity craft and adding AG force might explain the enormous weight that is attributed to "Encounters" Landing "footprints". Fred > > Jones > > BTW if you have ever experienced an animated fractal "journey" > such as the one on the iMax screen ... it gives a visceral > appreciation for traveling into another dimension in which there > is a seemingly preferred vector but no real linearity or > "signposts". It is little wonder that toakmaks and such are > difficult to control; and the same will likely be true with > gravity control. > Only when I crack up, Jones :-) Fred
