Chris,
If you reread the original post where I "complimented" the Correa's and many
others, you might notice it was I that was attacked by said Correa.
MC: I can believe that, even though I haven't followed this thread from its
start. A while back on Vo there were unjustified attacks from an associate
of the Correas whose name I don't now recall.
BTW, I contacted over 4000 others not listed from all branches of the
Government, NASA and Universities seeking some small assistance, to no avail
because I had no credentials, etc and what I said just couldn't possibly be
real - but it is.
MC: You experience is similar to the Correas, who made many attempts to
interest various possible clients, without success. They have been
approached by various interests which upon investigation appeard to be
bogus. After all that, they have become defensive.
If others want to think I have a bad attitude for calling a Spade a Spade -
so be it, but from here out I will work as I can without expecting anything
but the SOS from others.
MC: And so you wind up in a similar position, bitter and a bit battle-weary,
with a technology you believe works, unable to get support. This the fate of
many in the "OU" field, and one reason why Gene Mallove tried to provide a
receptive ear to people like you. He made serious efforts to be responsive
and did put money in various devices, all of which proved to be fatally
flawed. Greer at one point was making a similar effort, but I have heard no
reports of success.
Maybe some of the vorts should get off your duffs and invest in someone -
and since Mike says the Correa's have an OU device - start with them.
MC: I can cite four initiatives that I know of. 1) There is LENR/CMNS, with
hundreds of papers by credentialed investigators, clear evidence of an
energetic process but no device emerging from a somwhat disorganized field.
2) There is Mark Goldes, who has been maintaining a very correct position
and now energes with a patent for a possible OU device. 3) There is PAGD,
where there is a clear energy release from a 'aether' source [the Correa
patent states that the energy source is unknown to the inventor, but
eventually will be understood by the physics community]. The characteristics
of PAGD are such that building a useful working device, such as a motor,
powered by PAGD has been a difficult problem whose solution may be the
substance of the recent patent. And, finally, 4) Mills' BlackLight Power
process, which is well funded [$50+ million ], well organized, and may be
close to commercial development. Items 1) and 4) require a fuel, both
derivable from water.
MC: The contract that the Correas one time wanted was an up-front
irrevocable investment of some $15 million over a five year period, with the
Correas retaining 51% control. In other words, the investor cannot control
what is done or who does it. Lest this seem harsh, what the Correas wanted
to do was assemble a team of their choice who would have guaranteed
employment for five years to devote full time effort to the project. They
could not do this with typical venture capitalists, who want control and may
jerk the investment if they don't like what is going on.
MC: Chris, acquiring and holding support requires much more than a good idea
or device. Personality and many other factors enter in.
MC: Good luck.
Regards,
Mike Carrell
- Re: [Vo]: Correa Patent Issued Mike Carrell
-