Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > > Rhong Dhong wrote: >> Here's what I've been able to glean from their site. >> >> It is self-powered. There is no input. > > No it's not.
Right. The ceo has said he does not know the source of the energy. It isn't anything obvious, so maybe it is something like Frank Grimer's gamma atmosphere. Whatever it is, it just goes on and on and on, even to powering a 550bhp motor. > > This makes no sense, really. If they had something that really poured > out far more power than it consumed, how much "testing" would they need > to do to verify that it worked? The testing was done early on to eliminate the possibility of a measurement error. As I understand it, the testing since then has been to make it more efficient. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
