Dallas Abbott also said on the discovery channel that collisions
in the ocean would cause a lot of rain to fall.

Harry
 

[This is the print version of story

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790224.htm]

Last Update: Thursday, November 16, 2006. 3:00pm (AEDT)

Mega-tsunamis more common than we think: scientists

By Anna Salleh for Science Online

Enormous comets may have often bombarded our oceans in the past, causing
tsunamis that dwarf ones seen today, a small group of scientists says.

But most critics are yet to be convinced there is evidence to back claims
about such recent, frequent mega-impacts.

Conventional wisdom has it that the Earth suffered such violent hits from
space only twice every million years.

But scientists including Australian geomorphologist Associate Professor Ted
Bryant of the University of Wollongong have been studying what they say is
evidence of massive objects slamming into the Earth's oceans as recently as
500 years ago.

They say these kilometre-wide objects are likely to have been comets.

Prof Bryant says there have been up to 10 such impacts in the past 10,000
years, based on research with others, including Assistant Professor Dallas
Abbott from the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University.

Prof Bryant says these would have caused mega-tsunamis 10 times bigger than
the 2004 Asian tsunami, one of the largest earthquake-generated tsunamis the
world has ever seen.

"Aceh was a dimple compared to what we're looking at," said Professor
Bryant, who is associate dean of science at the university.

Evidence from Google Earth


Prof Bryant used satellite images from Google Earth to identify inland dunes
in the shape of arrowheads that he says are signs of mega-tsunamis.

He says the tsunamis would have displaced marine deposits containing marine
fossils, dumping them inland as 'chevron' dunes.

"We've found that chevrons are everywhere, everywhere around the world's
coasts," he said.

Prof Abbot used sea surface altimetry, which measures the height of the sea
surface to get an image of the seabed, to identify possible underwater
craters, which could be evidence of the impact that caused the tsunamis.

Prof Bryant says Prof Abbot also looked for melted material in cores from
the seabed around the craters to confirm impacts caused them.

The chevrons and craters were linked by the direction the chevrons were
pointing.

For example, two chevrons identified six kilometres inland from the Gulf of
Carpentaria in Australia both pointed north in the direction of two craters
found in the Gulf of Carpentaria itself, Prof Bryant says.

He says dating of sediments to the north of the craters suggests the impact
happened 1,500 years ago, and the well-preserved chevrons also date to
around the same time.

Indian Ocean crater


Prof Bryant says chevrons about 4,800 years old around the Indian Ocean are
associated with a 29-kilometre wide impact crater located thousands of
kilometres to the south-east of Madagascar.

"There are chevrons around the Indian Ocean that all point back to this one
crater site," he said.

He says this is supported by evidence from an anthropologist on the team who
found 170 myths and legends from the area dating back about 4,000 years
referring to an event that could have been the impact.

Prof Bryant says other evidence of a mega-tsunami as recently as 500 years
ago has been found on the eastern coast of Australia.

He and Prof Abbott have linked this one to an impact crater south of Stewart
Island in New Zealand.

None of the research has been published but some of it will be presented at
an American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco next month.

Mixed reception


Earth scientist Professor Richard Arculus of the Australian National
University says he accepts Prof Bryant's evidence of mega-tsunamis.

But he says working out what caused them and when will require more
evidence.

His colleague, marine sediment specialist Dr Bradley Opdyke, is also yet to
be convinced.

"They're heading in the right direction," he said.

But he believes more evidence is required to prove the existence of the
Indian Ocean crater.

New Zealand-based tsunami expert Dr Mauri McSaveney of GNS Science says
there is pretty good evidence that there are more large craters on our
planet than mainstream scientists think there should be.

While he says Prof Bryant's claims are "perfectly plausible" and the best
available evidence suggests the New Zealand crater is one from the Holocene
period, this could still be wrong.

"He has yet to convince me and a lot of others," Dr McSaveney said.

But as Prof Arculus says, Prof Bryant is fighting against a tradition in
earth sciences that suggests everything we see around us is the product of
slow processes rather than sudden catastrophic events.

"Geologists are naturally anti-catastrophe," he said.

"We're inclined to be conservative."

© 2006 Australian Broadcasting Corporation





Reply via email to