Well as I spent time with Bruce (and Andrew Mount and Paul Clarke) in New Zealand not long before he died and I can tell you that he was as Paul asserts a kind man, no negativity.
The last N-Machine test in NZ before his death was not so positive. I believe that the N-Machine will work as a motor (not FE) although I believe that the first machine possibly didn't have a motor force, it was very different with carbon brushes at 90 degrees. The N-Machine's magnetic field DOES rotate with the magnets, the voltage is generated in the external circuit and not on the rotating frame. The funny think is that the N-Machine is very very easy to test, don't test it as a generator, test it as a motor. However this whole discussion is foolishness, you can't get free energy from magnetic interactions. You can't get free energy with electrical arcs. You can't get free energy with electrostatics. Bruce knew how you get free energy, he called it "the primordial field, a sea of energy". Free Energy is not possible with any conventional element known to modern science, it is gained by making a device that harnesses 'The work wheel of nature' which isn't electrical, magnetic, sound (Keely), or nuclear but can influence how such devices work. If you make a device that works with both electrical and or magnetic principles and the work wheel of nature you get results. What we need to better understand is this work wheel of nature. If you look at devices it isn't hard to find one that does something strange besides create free energy, actually it's often harder to find one that doesn't have weird side effects. If you don't recognize the working principle behind a device, it is no wonder if you fail to get results. Look at Tesla's work, no one has replicated it to this day! Why? Because to truly replicate Tesla and get the results he got, a HV transformer connected to the mains will not cut it as the main's don't supply this 'work wheel' of nature (it being depleted way way down the line), but your average DC motor run backwards, or dynamo rectified will. The problem is that a whole branch of physics has been ignored by taking a wrong turn thanks to Einstein (despite the fact that he later said that there IS an aether and thinking otherwise is foolish), that's why conventional science seems right most of the time and the math holds out, all our technology is based on one specific set of ideas and principles, we have that part correct and indeed there is NO Free Energy or Antigravity there, not even detectable by super sensitive instruments. (generally) If you wish to blindly drive ahead you are welcome, but what I'm saying can be solidly proven beyond any doubt. On 1/21/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Goldes wrote: > Paul, VO, > > DePalma was a very sad case. He was fired by MIT. He maintained his N > Machine could never work as a motor but only as a generator. We hired > Ken Wasson, an excellent magnetics consultant, to visit Bruce and he > pointed out that it could be developed into a motor with a market large > enough to support his research. Bruce then called me and screamed into > the phone so loudly that I could hold it three feet away as he ranted > that this could not be true. > > His work was never Over Unity and the early report suggresting otherwise > was later retracted by Dr. Kinchloe as erroneous. > > An ME friend of mine went to work for DePalma in an effort to help him > and worked for subsistance wages. This was after Bruce emigrated from > the U.S. My friend concluded he was a fraud and was bilking investors. > He left in disgust. > > There seem to be endless efforts to find value in his work ever since > his death. As far as I am aware, all have come to naught. > > Mark On 2nd thought, I feel the need counter act the negativity that IMHO incorrectly portrays Bruce Depalma. Many a times I spent the day with Bruce Depalma and Andrew Mount in Santa Barbara. Not once did I ever see any such negative behavior from either one, and that's saying something given the fact I am a very blunt person. I have no idea what was happening to Bruce during the last years of his life. Understandably he may have begun to lose patience, but the Bruce I knew was a gentleman. A man who treated people with respect and kindness. A man who loved people. I remember Andrew Mount told me Bruce would call his Mother every day to help add a little something special to her life. He was a caring person! Regards, Paul Lowrance >> From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bruce Depalma & "Free Energy" >> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:12:35 -0800 (PST) >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > In fact, I can now describe all atomic orbits >> > >> > _http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html_ >> > (http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html) >> > >> > >> > enjoy >> > >> > Frank Znidarsic >> >> >> Maybe you're interested in the late Bruce Depalma's >> work --> >> >> Gyro Drop Experiment: >> http://depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.html >> >> Understanding the Dropping of the Spinning Ball >> Experiment: >> http://depalma.pair.com/SpinningBall(Understanding).html >> >> Home page: >> http://depalma.pair.com/ >> >> I'm uncertain why Bruce Depalma's work is ignored. I >> visited Bruce when he lived in Santa >> Barbara, CA. From what I know it seems legit. The >> common "free energy" N-machine power >> measurements are simple-- DC in, DC out. I know Bruce >> had Electrical Engineer test his >> machines. One of the earlier published data clearly >> shows "free energy." IMHO either this >> was one of the biggest scams or it's legit. Some may >> thing the N-machine appears too >> simple to generate "free energy," but Bruce's wide >> range of experiments dealing with >> gravity & inertia revealed spinning objects change the >> surrounds. The falling ball >> experiments are classical examples --> >> http://depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.html >> >> Bruce's N-machines produce appreciably high angular >> forces-- over 9000 G's. Perhaps >> that's a window for "free energy." >> >> http://www.rexresearch.com/trombly/trombly.htm >> >> http://www.rexresearch.com/tewari/tewari.htm >> >> http://www.rexresearch.com/depalma/depalma.htm >> >> >> Regards, >> Paul Lowrance ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
