Michel Jullian wrote:
 > Oh I think I understand at last your reasoning: in
this case in your view energy is 
conserved
 > because the field energy decreases while the
kinetic energy increases. Whereas in the case
 > of the two permanent magnets _both_ the field
energy and the kinetic energy increase, 
so you
 > think there is a net gain of energy. Do I interpret
correctly your line of thought?


Regarding the electro-magnet we can precisely trace
where such energy comes from, as 
described in earlier posts.  The million-dollar
question is regarding charged particles 
such as the electron.  So far we can only speculate
where the electrons energy exists or 
what sustains the electron.  Indeed many QM physicist
claim the electron has no size as we 
understand. Perhaps it does, perhaps it does not. 
Perhaps the energy is found in a higher 
dimension. We know it requires energy to create the
electron. Therefore, such energy must 
exist.


Regards,
Paul Lowrance



 > ----- Original Message -----
 > From: Michel Jullian
 > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
 > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:07 AM
 > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using
*standard* physics
 >
 >
 >> I suppose that's one way to look at it. Does this
allow you to find E - E' ?
 >>
 >> Michel
 >>
 >> ----- Original Message -----
 >> From: Paul
 >> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
 >> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:14 AM
 >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using
*standard* physics
 >>
 >>
 >>> Michel Jullian wrote:
 >>>> Ok, electric then. Can you draw energy more than
 >>> once from the coulombic attraction of
 >>> a charged body of say +1 coulomb accelerating
towards
 >>> a fixed equal and opposite charge? I
 >>> mean for example:
 >>>> - How much energy E do you retrieve by releasing
it
 >>> from 1m away and stopping it 1cm
 >>> away? (say converting 100% of it's KE to heat)
 >>>> - Which energy E' must you expend to bring it
back
 >>> 1m away so you can retrieve E again
 >>> from the system?
 >>>> - What's the net energy E - E' pumped per cycle?
 >>>>
 >>>> Michel
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> It's the same as an electro-magnetic in that
energy is
 >>> moved.  Two oppositely charge and
 >>> attracted objects accelerating toward each other
 >>> cancel each others E-field. So the
 >>> E-field energy is moved to KE.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Regards,
 >>> Paul Lowrance



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front

Reply via email to