Hi Robin, > >What you are missing is that spending money on reducing unimportant GHG > >emissions could be spent on technology for surviving natural climate > >change. The IPCC is shooting themselves in the head. > > > >Dave > > What you are missing is that the money would be better spent on CF, so > that we both reduce GHG emissions, and increase wealth.
CF would fall under the category of "technology for surviving natural climate change." BTW, I used to work for one of Pons and Fleischmann's financiers as finance manager for some of his other businesses. Dave
