> Harry: >> The raison d'ĂȘtre of GR is to explain gravity. > Stephen: > That's right. But you don't need it to resolve the twins problem, which > takes place in flat space. I am confused. In your first response to me you started off by saying the opposite: > Harry: >> That works in SR, but the solution is inconsistent with GR. > > Stephen: > Wrong. In fact the full solution can only be had using techniques > commonly considered to be part of GR. Harry
- Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox John Berry
- Re: [Vo]: FW: Einstein's Twin Paradox Michel Jullian