----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles M. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Diode array 070304


>A single diode would produce the least power for the least 
> overcome load. It is the hardest to measure and least 
> productive. It can be done but is overly academic. 

Never mind, it would be a first step in the right direction, how would you go 
about measuring it?

To Paul: stop the ad hominem.

Michel

> Candidate abrasives for sandpaper can be tested by trying 
> one grain but practical surface smoothing isn't done that 
> way.
> 
> I am looking for people that sincerely want to escape the 
> Second Law of Thermodynamics.
> 
> Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:47:50 +0100
>  "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>"Charlie, Charlie, Charlie Brown" (sorry couldn't 
>>resist), why don't you just try this scheme with a single 
>>resistor and diode in a good Faraday cage rather than 
>>spamming us with it regularly?
>>
>>Such a prototype wouldn't cost much compared to my 
>>Sterling engine + heat pump scheme ;-)
>>
>>Michel
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Charles M. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:07 AM
>>Subject: [Vo]: Diode array 070304
>>
>>
>>> The Johnson noise produced in resistors  is A.C. which 
>>> will have an average voltage of zero. A group of 
>>>resistors 
>>> will have act like one equivalent resistor. Diodes in 
>>> consistent alignment parallel will conduct more Johnson 
>>> noise current and less voltage when the internal 
>>>electrons 
>>> move from the cathode to the anode. A rectified residue 
>>>of 
>>> Johnson noise power will be aggregated on the buss 
>>>sheets 
>>> that merges the outputs of all the consistently aligned 
>>> diodes, The anodes connected to one buss and the 
>>>cathodes 
>>> connected to a second buss. Aggregated D.C. power can be 
>>> tapped from the busses while an equivalent amount of 
>>> ambient thermal energy is absorbed. Last I heard, Paul 
>>> agrees with this design. IIRC Jones Beene rejects it 
>>> without comment, and I agree with Paul's further 
>>> deductions that a resistor / LED array would convert 
>>> ambient heat into light and Paul's other approach that a 
>>> ambient IR photocell would convert ambient heat into 
>>>D.C. 
>>> electrical power where an extensive cathode would be the 
>>> negative terminal. I believe that the diode array is the 
>>> most practical method. I do not believe that lenses or 
>>> mirrors will concentrate ambient IR.
>>> 
>>> I applied for Branson's prize without spelling out that 
>>> the way to use apply diode arrays  to CO2 reduction 
>>>would 
>>> be to use diode arrays as air conditioners in tropical 
>>> climates and use the resultant electrical power to 
>>> decompose CO2; I mentioned that air conditioners would 
>>> yield electrical power but I neglected to immediately 
>>>tie 
>>> this attribute to CO2  decomposition. I mailed my 
>>> narritive in early Feb and have not received an 
>>> aknowlegement or reply.
>>> 
>>> Aloha,
>>> 
>>> Charlie 
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to