>> On 3/5/07, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Borbas believes like many amateur physicists before him that he has >>> disproved the ion wind explanation, it's a long story he has been >>> multiposting/spamming several dozens of mailing lists with his uninformed >>> theory. He doesn't even realize that the air discharge implies an ion >>> current, which implies neutrals entrainment i.e. ion wind, this pretty well >>> sums it up.
It is not clear in what direction the ion wind is headed. The ion wind appears to be directed to wires at the centre of rotation. If that is the case, how could such a wind force the balls to rotate? Harry
