Thanks for the helpful comment :) What I meant is that experimenting with macroscopic bouncing balls in boxes should accurately model the way we _think_ the nanoscale device would work, so that if it doesn't work it is most likely that the nanoscale device won't work either.
The boxes could be tied to a common plate shaked by a loudspeaker playing white noise, with the amplifier's volume setting determining the "temperature", how does that sound Charlie? (also please explain your video idea, I didn't get it) Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 8:50 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]: multiple pawl rotational rectification > Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> This should give a correct yes/no qualitative result shouldn't it? >> >> Michel > > Perhaps. > ;-) > > Harry >
