It's a chicken and egg problem, money can only come with demonstrable success, and success once every 6 months is hard to demonstrate obviously.
What was the magnitude of your last heat production BTW, in terms of COP? Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:12 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer > My last successful heat production was about 6 months ago. At the > present time, the effect is initiated by chance when the required > conditions happen to be in place. We do not yet know how to create the > conditions on purpose. However, I can tell you a lot of conditions that > don't work, conditions worth avoiding. Also, some conditions are more > likely to work than others, but not every time. This problem is not > caused by error or by cold fusion not being real. It is caused solely by > ignorance. People who have the financial support to run many studies are > having increased success, but still not every time. Like all complex > phenomenon, parameter space is huge and success only happens after a > considerable investment of time and money. This investment has not been > applied, thanks to the skeptics. > > Ed > > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Paul probably meant "in your experience", could you e.g. relate when you >> last witnessed the effect personally Ed? >> >> Michel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 6:57 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer >> >> >> >>>In answer to your question, cold fusion is real. In fact it is more >>>real than is the uninformed opinion of Michael Shermer. By this I mean, >>>cold fusion is a phenomenon of nature that has been witnessed now by >>>hundreds of people. Obviously, Michael Shermer has not taken the >>>responsibility to learn about the field even thought he prides himself >>>on being an honest skeptic. As a result, it is hard to believe anything >>>he says about any subject. >>> >>>A book entitled "The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction" will be >>>published soon by World Scientific Publishers that will summarize the >>>evidence for the reality of cold fusion and give a plausible model for >>>its initiation. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Ed Storms >>> >>>Paul Lowrance wrote: >>> >>>>Did anyone listen to Coast to Coast AM (replay) last night where the >>>>skeptic Michael Shermer, director of "The Skeptics Society," kept using >>>>Cold Fusion as a prime example of a debacle hoax. >>>> >>>>For those working in cold fusion, is cold fusion real? >>>> >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Paul Lowrance >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
