The criteria of "Indisputability" is excessive. If this what the physics community demands, then it has become a kind of Church in possesion of indisputable truths.
I think it is enough to prove it "beyond a shadow of a doubt." Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:50 am Subject: [Vo]: Re: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer > I think it may be real, but not indisputably so yet. > Indisputability is very difficult to get, which IMHO is a shame > after 18 years since the first CF experiment. Hence my suggestion > of a "COP cop" lab, which would have other uses than CF of course. > > Michel > > (*) In any system, even cold, the fusion rate is never absolute zero. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Lowrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 4:42 PM > Subject: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer > > > > Did anyone listen to Coast to Coast AM (replay) last night where > the skeptic > > Michael Shermer, director of "The Skeptics Society," kept using > Cold Fusion as a > > prime example of a debacle hoax. > > > > For those working in cold fusion, is cold fusion real? > > > > > > Regards, > > Paul Lowrance > > > >
