Sure it is quantized, but this doesn't make it "apparent". Michel
----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone > > If light was literally a projectile, then it should be literally subject > to the laws of mechanics and momentum changes should vary continuously. > However, we know empirically that light of a particular wavelength > can only bring about discrete changes of momentum. > > > Harry > > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Well, it does bounce back from the object (e.g. solar sail) it imparted >> momentum to, with total momentum being conserved and all. >> >> Michel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:09 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone >> >> >>> In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the >>> nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical >>> force. (I do mean "refuses" and not simply "resists"). >>> >>> Harry >>> >>> Michel Jullian wrote: >>> >>>> For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, >>>> that's what pushes solar sails. >>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure >>>> >>>> Michel >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "R.C.Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM >>>> Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone >>>> >>>> >>>>> Howdy Jones, >>>>> >>>>> You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One >>>>> must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching >>>>> into one of your posts <grin> that can range from rail guns to Ormus... >>>>> and >>>>> that is a stretch. >>>>> >>>>> Now that light has been accepted as having "particle" or "weight", it can >>>>> be >>>>> taken to the next step and think of light having "projectile force" >>>>> qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled >>>>> "mass" ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better >>>>> constructed >>>>> railgun would fire a " projectile of light"... hmmm.. a strange beasty >>>>> indeed.. Why so ? >>>>> Because the projectile could be " tuned" to either/or focus or impact. >>>>> Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes >>>>> and >>>>> tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. >>>>> This >>>>> description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the >>>>> projectile >>>>> does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. >>>>> >>>>> You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new >>>>> method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does >>>>> describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me >>>>> of >>>>> the account of the angel that would "stir" or "trouble" the waters in the >>>>> pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter >>>>> would be healed. If the "stirring" means inducing a water vortex and only >>>>> the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed >>>>> by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties >>>>> dissappear? >>>>> >>>>> Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still >>>>> left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that " thinkin >>>>> drinkin" stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. >>>>> >>>>> Richard >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
