I'm not taking sides, but IMHO there's very little logic in your statement
Michel. I would tend to agree Mr. Newman appears to not understand certain
physics, but that is by no means proof Newman has not invented or stumbled upon
a major discovery. That's like saying the Wright Brothers could not have
invented the first heavier than air powered plane to fly under sustained control
because they clearly did not understand certain laws of physics, lol.
According to one video documentary engineers from Mississippi State University
tested Mr. Newman's device and representatives of the State Department of Energy
were on hand to observe the testing. For 6 days tests were ran with perplexing
results. WWL Engineers conducted and confirmed one of such tests done by the
engineers at Mississippi State University. I would suggest you watch to video
documentary:
Skip to 2 minutes and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
> Apart from his own evidence being clearly insufficient (the burden of proof
should be his), some of his arguments are clearly deceptive. For example, he
claims the pump is running with a 10ft head, using this as an argument that it
is doing work. In reality the output hose does go up 10 ft, but then it goes
down 10ft (it's just flung over a 10 ft ladder), so the pump runs with zero head
in fact, it doesn't do any work against gravity.
>
> Michel
---
