Jones Beene wrote:
"Heavy O" is not a new oat cereal. And we're not talking
That corresponding isotopic ratio of O in space (16O/18O), and in
stars, and in rocks of various ages, is such that it might appear (to
this casual observer at least) from the available data that 18O is
somehow being manufactured over time, compared to its 'natural'
proportion following a stellar nova event.
Interesting observation Jones, there is well documented experimental
evidence to indicate that biologically assisted nuclear reactions occur.
Perhaps some Vortexian can suggest a reaction leading to 18 O's production.
There is data, not new but recently found with google's help,
suggestive of an explanation- on the 18O formation side, involving
carbon.
http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=18/18O_1959.shtml
Is that what those formulas prove? I was unable to understand them.
Not to mention a possible non-military use for the stockpile of
depleted U: that being some kind of a "decay reactor" for
I'm listening to Joyce Reiley of Gulf War Veterans talking about D U
weapons poisoning Iraq, and everything in the country, disgusting.
Perhaps someone can come up with a CANR to do something about it.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
