Pierre Carbonnelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me:
"The time needed to police the article is very low now. I think that this is because the case was made properly to the skeptics, with the support of 2004 DOE."
I told him I am glad he does not have waste his time, but the skeptics I hear from are as vociferous as ever. Maybe they are getting tired of arguing. Who knows?
By the way, I posted a follow up message with the URL of the article on Wales, which did not come back to me. Here it is again: http://reason.com/news/show/119689.html
- Jed
