That's good, keep us tuned if that supply doesn't get you ;-) Regarding 3 and 4, why would you expect to see air moving outside of the bag? The device and Newton should be happy with air moving only inside (in the direction opposite the rotor) shouldn't they?
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle R. Mcallister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:54 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miklos Borbas Thruster?? > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> >> Kyle kindly proposed to do some more tests, a smoke test with the >> rotor blocked and another one without the rotor (and its spindle >> bluntes) would be quite instructive! >> > > Yes, I can probably do that in a bit. I'm off now to go deal with some > things around the house, etc., but when I get the chance I will try: > > 1. Smoke test with a blocked rotor. > 2. Smoke test with a spinning rotor, maybe backlit this time to see a > bit more clearly. Last time I saw almost no motion, but I will try > again, it is always possible I missed something before. > 3. Smoke test on the outside of the device with a bag over it. > 4. Smoke test on the outside of the device in a bag, and held stationary. > 5. And I will try it with AC, as Horace requests. Various frequencies of > course. > > --Kyle >
