Michel Jullian wrote:
Interesting, how is the 11 year periodicity of the sunspots explained in this
theory?
Michel
Well, it isn't. However, on the 11 year cycle, we are at solar sun spot
minimum, but the number of sun spots are said to be at the maximum
predicted by the 11 year cycle. Ditto for solar irradiance.
----- Original Message -----
From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is also evidence for the notion that sunspots are caused by
asteroids or comets hitting the sun. Some will have a high iron
content. Few people understand the consequences of the enormous
energy gained by bodies approaching the sun.
Interesting post Horace. I have previously mentioned Jim McCanney. He
says that big rocks are impacting the Sun. They come from a direction
orthogonal to the planetary ecliptic. Given their distance from Earth,
they would have to be sizable in order to be photographable. Sun spots,
and increased solar irradiance are said to be coincident with these
impacts. Interesting story, unfortunately Jim is the only person talking
about it, and he doesn't answer emails.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
