Assuming that all the hoopla is for real, and Steorn
demonstrates unequivocal OU - what does it all mean
for the near future? 

Besides of course: that Randi, Park and the other
PsiCops will be exposed to be the nay-saying morons
which all have accused them of being - in the past
(not for being skeptics but for not actually looking
closely at good experimental results, as otherwise
skepticism is warranted). 

Randi, for one, will certainly be challenged to hand
over some big bucks.

Well - for Steorn itself - there is nothing to worry
about or even to try to help them with - as they will
be absolutely flooded with VC money and can chart
their own course. 

There is a ton of prior art in this field, however,
and they may end up spending a great deal of time
defending whatever they have (IP) against the
copycats. Let's ignore those juicy details for a
moment; and forget the fact that dozens of inventors
have seen glimpses of whatever it is that Steorn have
finally (apparently) been able to make robust.

As for the rest of us - this also portends great news,
and the opening of financial coffers: in that once and
for all, it will demonstrate the validity of some
usable source of 'hidden energy' and possible
violation of the LoT, which must surely be related to
ZPE. The implications for other lines of R&D are
immense.

They (Steorn) have claimed in the past that there is
no temperature drop - or other idicia of thermodynamic
change in the equipment. To me, that lack of natural
balancing of local energy is the biggest surprise, if
it is true. 

It would not have surprised me at all if that prior
comment from Steorn turns out NOT to be true, however,
and that there will indeed be discovered a concomitant
temperature drop which they either failed to measure
properly, or chose not to disclose at this time. 

The temperature drop, if it turns out to be there,
could exist across a comparatively large volume of
space, rather than in the active component itself - so
that measuring the Orbo device vs. the 'surrounding
air' for instance, is guaranteed to turn up nothing !
whereas the total thermal energy of a sealed room in
which the thing is operating may itself drop in
comparison with an identical room without the device.

Time will tell, but even on a hot day in July at the
Museum in London, the air conditioning load may turn
out to be less than expected ;-)

Jones 

Reply via email to