I concur with Judge Steven V. Johnson's conclusions. Jed wrote:
> There are none in dispute. We will accept any or all. You are hereby sentenced to add "in the form of his choice", because readers don't give a damn about the format in which they can access a previously unavailable resource, and the ball will be in Mitchell's court, he might even decide to provide them in the format you like most if he is not forced to. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jed Rothwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 11:04 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ed/Jed-Mitchell dispute (was Re: Requesting comments to this comment) > OrionWorks wrote: > >>If an individual for whatever reason feels they cannot trust the >>integrity of another individual who appears to be in the position of >>editing [tampering with] their personal material (their CHILD, >>so-to-speak!)... > > That is what Swartz claims, but is it 100% pure, unadulterated garbage. I > have told him a million times that if he supplies the paper in text Acrobat > format, I will upload it as is, without changing a single comma. Heck, even > if it has a few spelling errors I won't ask for a revision. I have told that > to every author and I have repeated it here many times. I would never change > the contents of his paper and upload a version that he does not approve! > That's absurd. > > >>I gather few have been able to access the contents of Dr. Swartz's >>papers, specifically the ones in dispute . . . > > There are none in dispute. We will accept any or all. > > >> . . . because as I understand it >>they aren't on-line ANYWHERE. Is this correct assumption, or have I >>erred? > > You got it. > > >>Under the circumstances it seems to me that if Dr. Schwartz >>would be so kind as to upload the disputed papers to his own web site >>(as-is?) that this would go a long way in resolving the controversy. > > That, he will never do. > > >>Is there a problem with this approach? Is there insufficient web space >>available at Dr. Swartz web site? > > That can't be the reason. Nowadays web space is cheap as dirt. > > - Jed > > >
