Hi Esa
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/D14.pdf
The problem here is that the heat content of the gas produced is
unknown. Until it is known, all comments that you receive will be almost
worthless.
This Lawton replication has been around for over a year and Lawton was
asked to measure the heat content back then. This figure has never been
published AFAIK, nor has anything relevant from Ravi. The amount of gas
which is evolved means nothing. The heat content of the gas must be
measured accurately. Often such a mixed gas can contain significant
water vapor.
Until this data is published, no comment is meaningful.
The only logical assumption from the lack of real data, unfortunately,
is that the heat content is NOT overunity. I think it is logical to
assume that when anyone measures true and reproducible overunity, in the
heat value of the gas, compared to the energy required to produce it,
then you will hear about it, loud-and-clear. This has not happened yet.
Why do I seem so sure of this?
The first person to demonstrate robust, on-demand overunity, especially
in so simple a device will- WITHOUT ANY QUESTION- be an immediate
candidate for the Nobel prize, and become as wealthy as they want to be.
It is that simple.
But running a VW engine for 10 minutes on a little H2 and a lot of
crankcase oil, as Stanley Meyer did, is not proof of anything important.
Under the circumstances of having solid scientific data, few care to
keep a secret for very long, as many others are also close to success
... and that includes those who are paranoid, or gullible enough, to
believe the tall-tales of MIB raiding the garage of an unknown inventor,
here or in India (how convenient for those who cannot produce real data).
Do not fall prey to that kind of paranoid nonsense. There are plenty of
evil men in the world, but they do not waste time on small-time
inventors who cannot document a valid scientific anomaly.
Jones
