:-)
On 9/29/07, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LOL
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer
> catalyzed fusion hypothesis)
>
>
> Could it get us to Uranus?
>
> Terry
>
> On 9/29/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ha! "sphincter propulsion" Luv it...
> >
> > ... don't think anyone has evoked that exact wording before, but lest
> > the skeptics out there latch-onto to something derogatory like
> > "toilet-fizzix", can we just call it "venturi propulsion" or something a
> > little less organic?
> >
> > Jones
> >
> > Michel Jullian wrote:
> > > (#CF = DIESECF Desorbing-Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed
> > > Fusion, # being "dièse" in French)
> > >
> > > As I suggested to someone in a private message a few weeks ago, I think
> > > the desorbing deuteron must have more energy than that due to its free
> > > fall in the electron layer's electric field, in the form of a "sphincter
> > > contraction" like expulsion energy (sorry for the gruesome image). This
> > > would be due to the elastic nature of the Pd crystal which could be
> > > expected to re-contract locally with the participation of a large number
> > > of surface Pd atoms after the deuteron's passage. This kinetic energy
> > > could be a welcome complement to the electron layer's screening effect.
> > >
> > > This complementary effect could explain why CF occurs with Pd and D, with
> > > Ni (tighter lattice) and H (protium), but not (or less) e.g. with Pd and
> > > H, because the smaller protium would flow "too easily" (with less
> > > sphincter propulsion) out of the relatively roomy Pd lattice.
> > >
> > > Hope this makes some sense. Do let me know anyone if this sphincter
> > > aspect of hydrogen nuclei expulsion has been evoked before and/or
> > > quantified.
> > >
> > > Michel
> > >
> > > P.S. Of course the whole hypothesis, which I have presented in
> > > essentially classical terms (my apologies to "real" theoreticians for
> > > that), will have to be translated to quantum physics language and
> > > quantified before it can be considered a proper theory. This will be done
> > > IF --big if-- it is confirmed experimentally, there being obviously
> > > little point in theorizing further if it is proved wrong.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
