Our good friend Greg Watson of SMOT fame has beat you to the punch:

http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/

Word is that he is making $$A.

Terry

On Dec 16, 2007 6:56 PM, Michael Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope they succeed at what they are doing. I am concerned that I cannot find
> how much indium and gallium they use either per square meter or per watt. The
> price of both of these elements is rising geometrically. Since they are
> byproducts of other metal refining, there is no way to increase production of
> these elements by themselves. This is an issue they are surely concerned 
> about,
> but make no mention of it that I know of.
>
> I have put off raising capital for my own photovoltaic project, wherein I use
> very inexpensive fresnel lens arrays of my own manufacture in conjuction with
> the Boeing-Spectrolab concentrator chips. I have done this because I want to
> see how the Nanosolar system pencils out. Because my system requires tracking
> it makes it less attractive than a static flat panel, even though the energy
> conversion efficiency is much higher. My concentrator system could credibly
> reach less than a dollar per watt, but Nanosolar is claiming thirty cents last
> time I checked.  I have no idea what they base this claim on and I am still a
> bit skeptical as I see the prices of indium and gallium soar.
>
> If anyone has some information on Nanosolar's use of these elements on a per
> watt or per unit area basis, I would appreciate a link.
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
> --- Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/12/nanosolar-starts-thin-film-solar-panel-production/
> >
> > "Nanosolar CEO Martin Roscheisen tells us this morning that the company has
> > already started
> > production of its thin-film solar panels. The company had set a goal to 
> > start
> > production and
> > shipping by the end of this year, and in our post "10 Questions for 
> > Nanosolar
> > CEO Martin Roscheisen"
> > back in July, Roscheisen told us: "Yes, we're on track with this. Do not
> > expect an Apple-style
> > product launch, though."
> > Roscheisen tells us that the company has reached that goal with production 
> > at
> > its San Jose, Calif.,
> > manufacturing facility. We're not sure to what extent production is being
> > done, but Roscheisen says
> > there will be more info coming soon..."
> >
> > Impressively on schedule. Nothing about this on their site
> > http://www.nanosolar.com yet.
> >
> > Michel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>      
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>

Reply via email to