On 17/4/2008 6:01 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:

> I agree 100%, what would seem anomalous to me would be no "anomalies" in the
> trajectories.
> 
> Michel

sorry?


 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:V'Ger must evolve
> 
> 
> In reply to  Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:46:08 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> Possible effects:
> 
> 1) Tidal.
> 2) Friction with space dust.
> 3) Interaction with the Solar wind.
> 4) Uneven solar heating.
> 5) Gravitational interaction with the Oort cloud &/or Kuiper belt (only
> mentioned because no one knows their mass or distribution, hence they can't
> possibly have been properly taken into consideration.)
> 6) Electric charge on the craft, either residual or built up through
> interaction
> with the solar wind &/or friction.
> 7) Magnetic field of the space craft interacting with the magnetic field of
> the
> Earth &/or Sun. (Magnetic field generated through rotation of the craft,
> causing
> the residual electrostatic charge to rotate.)
> 8) All of the above.
> 
> I write this list just to show that any such calculations are probably based
> upon simplified models which most likely ignore most is not all of the above.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robin van Spaandonk


Perturbation modelling is not what I would call bold science. ;-)

Harry

Reply via email to